简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:SEC files lawsuit against Joseph Nantomah and his companies for real estate investment fraud in Wisconsin. Over $1.9M raised from investors in a fraudulent property flip scheme.
A newly unsealed SEC lawsuit real estate fraud case has rocked the Upper Midwests investment community. On 1 August 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a 39-page complaint in the Eastern District of Wisconsin accusing self-styled millionaire mentor Joseph Nantomah and three companies he controls—Investors Capital LLC, Global Investors Capital LLC, and High Income Performance Partners LLC—of orchestrating a multi-state “fix-and-flip” property racket that raised at least $1.9 million from 30 investors.
According to federal prosecutors, Nantomah, 39, pitched a classic real estate flip fraud scheme from May 2020 through January 2024. He assured clients that their cash would be used to buy distressed homes, renovate them quickly, and resell them at a hefty profit. Slick social-media videos, glowing web copy, and polished seminar decks presented him as a rags-to-riches immigrant who landed in Wisconsin in 2016 with $4,700 and built a “$23 million” property empire in less than a decade.
The pitch resonated, especially within the Nigerian-American diaspora, and money poured in. Written contracts promised annual returns between 10 and 30 percent—sometimes even higher—with principal plus profit due back in as little as three months. For follow-up rounds, many investors relied on verbal assurances alone, persuaded by the coachs booming confidence and a stack of glossy before-and-after photos.
Behind the scenes, however, investigators say less than one-fifth of incoming funds ever reached a closing table or a contractor. Bank records cited in the complaint show that more than 80 percent of investor capital was siphoned into Nantomahs personal checking accounts or to related entities with no connection to real estate rehabilitation. The SEC alleges that the money financed jewelry, designer clothing, airfare, luxury hotel stays, and at least two late-model sports cars.
Meanwhile, the bricks-and-mortar empire touted online appears to have been a mirage. Public filings list just 11 properties—together worth roughly $1 million—owned by Nantomah or his companies during the relevant period. Of the ten homes highlighted in marketing materials, seven were never purchased at all, and two slipped into foreclosure soon after acquisition.
When promised maturation dates arrived, most investors received neither principal nor the lucrative “ROI” spelled out in their agreements. Emails and text messages included in court exhibits show a pattern of delay tactics: “bank paperwork mix-ups,” “title issues,” and even “unforeseen supply-chain problems” for renovations that, prosecutors now allege, never began.
Frustrated, several backers eventually sued in state court. Yet, according to the federal complaint, Nantomah and his entities continued to raise fresh capital without disclosing the outstanding obligations or mounting litigation—another red flag the SEC says violated antifraud provisions of federal securities law.
The governments filing outlines five counts: unregistered securities offerings, fraud in the offer or sale of securities, fraud in connection with the purchase or sale of securities, deceptive practices, and the making of untrue statements of material fact. Collectively dubbed the Joseph Nantomah SEC charges, they fall under Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act of 1934, along with Rule 10b-5.
Regulators are seeking a permanent injunction banning Nantomah from selling securities, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest, and civil penalties calibrated to deter repeat behavior. The agency argues there is “a reasonable likelihood” the defendants will continue to violate securities laws unless stopped.
This matter joins a growing ledger of SEC enforcement actions in 2025 focused on real estate investment promoters who leveraged social-media personas to mask shaky balance sheets. In the first seven months of the year alone, the Commission has announced more than a dozen real estate-centric fraud cases, signaling a renewed emphasis on protecting mom-and-pop investors from glossy but hollow pitches.
While Ponzi-style property ploys are hardly new, the regional angle makes this a headline-grabbing real estate investment scam Wisconsin saga. Small-town investors from Milwaukee to Green Bay say they were drawn in by the promise of revitalizing local neighborhoods and sharing in rapid equity gains. Instead, many now face personal financial strain—college funds drained, retirement accounts tapped, home-equity lines maxed out.
One investor recounted wiring $100,000 after attending a weekend “wealth boot camp” where Nantomah urged attendees to “stop letting banks make money off your fear.” Another, a nurse who immigrated from Lagos a decade ago, says she contributed her entire life savings, believing she was supporting a fellow Nigerian chasing the American dream.
Experts who track white-collar crime note that Nantomahs backstory—underdog immigrant turned self-made millionaire—fits perfectly into an increasingly common social-media trope. The SEC complaint highlights Instagram videos showing luxury SUVs and motivational slogans, while LinkedIn posts touted a portfolio “north of $23 million.” The aspirational narrative, coupled with high-energy seminars, proved magnetic.
“People dont invest in spreadsheets; they invest in stories,” says Dr. Karen Ludlow, a criminologist at the University of Wisconsin. “When the story contains cultural affinity, promises quick returns, and offers access to exclusive deals, the psychological pull can be overwhelming.”
Seasoned financial advisers say the Nantomah saga underscores three timeless safeguards:
For immigrant communities in particular, vigilance is paramount. Fraudsters often exploit linguistic or cultural trust to short-circuit due diligence questions.
The defendants must file an answer or pre-trial motions within 21 days of service. Discovery could stretch into 2026, but the SEC is already pressing for a preliminary injunction to freeze assets. Parallel criminal investigations have not been announced, yet observers note that civil fraud findings often pave the way for wire-fraud indictments.
If the Commission prevails, investors may see partial restitution through disgorgement, though actual recovery will hinge on how much cash—if any—remains after personal spending sprees. For now, court documents suggest a steep climb: many account balances are reportedly near zero.
The Nantomah complaint reads like a template for bad actors nationwide: enticing webinars, promises of community uplift, vague paperwork, and lavish self-promotion. In an era when the average American follows at least a dozen financial influencers, the case is a timely reminder to verify, not just trust, online personas.
As the docket for SEC enforcement actions 2025 grows, regulators hope high-profile actions like this one will deter the next would-be guru from turning social capital into illicit profit. Until then, the agency urges potential investors to consult its EDGAR database and Investor.gov “Scam Meter” before signing checks—especially for any venture marketed as a fast, fixed, and certain path to riches.
Don't miss out on the latest news and updates in the financial market. Download and install the WikiFX app by scanning the QR code below.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Reputed authorities like the FCA have issued warnings against brokers who act genuine but are actually fake brokers. They copy details such as logos, names, branding, and sometimes even employee appearances to trick investors and steal money from them. These are, in reality, scam brokers, and you need to Fraud alert while investing in the forex market.
Investors, Pay Attention! This is a serious warning from the Securities Commission Malaysia against 5 scam brokers operating in the forex market without a legal license. Here is the list of 5 fake brokers you must avoid.
Binance unlocks Bitcoin options for all users, slashes maker-taker costs, and boosts its Options Enhanced Program to entice both retail and institutional traders.
Ultima Markets has secured authorization from the FCA to offer CFDs to retail clients in the United Kingdom, marking its entry into one of the world’s most heavily regulated and competitive markets. According to the FCA register, the trading name “Ultima Markets” was approved on 21 July 2025.