简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:A new report by ESMA reveals that national regulators across the EU issued more than 970 sanctions totaling €71 million in 2024. While market abuse and MiFID II violations dominated the fines, the agency highlighted the fragmented enforcement landscape across member states.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published its first consolidated enforcement report, revealing that financial regulators across the European Union imposed over 970 sanctions in 2024, amounting to more than €71 million in fines. The penalties were mainly for violations under the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) and the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II).
The report, which covers enforcement actions from all 27 EU member states, plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway, highlights significant disparities in enforcement approaches. While some national competent authorities (NCAs) favor administrative fines, others rely on warnings or business restrictions.
“The report highlighted the need for greater convergence in sanctioning by NCAs,” ESMA stated, pointing to the lack of consistency in how financial misconduct is punished across the bloc.
Among the national regulators, Cyprus CySEC stood out by conducting over 850 audits, issuing €2.76 million in fines, and withdrawing several licenses. This signals a continued focus on investor protection and regulatory tightening.
In addition to compiling the data, ESMA took direct enforcement action last year, including sanctions against Scope Ratings GmbH for conflicts of interest and the withdrawal of licenses from several data and rating agencies.
The publication comes alongside ESMAs broader strategic objectives. In 2024, ESMA pushed forward reforms such as T+1 settlement cycle work, crypto-asset regulatory frameworks, ESG term usage in fund names, and the launch of the European Single Access Point (ESAP), expected to go live in 2026.
Looking ahead, ESMA will begin supervising ESG rating providers and EU green bond verifiers, further expanding its role as the EUs central market watchdog.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
It's always advisable to read online review articles about forex brokers you are thinking to Invest your money with. The forex market has become increasingly unsafe due to the rise of fraudulent brokers. Review articles help you spot scam brokers and protect your money. Read this important article about DB Investing to stay fraud alert.
Are high spreads charged by iForex disallowing you to make profits? Do you feel that you will never be able to withdraw from iForex? It's nothing new! Read this exposure story where we have highlighted complaints from several investors.
Reputed authorities like the FCA have issued warnings against brokers who act genuine but are actually fake brokers. They copy details such as logos, names, branding, and sometimes even employee appearances to trick investors and steal money from them.
Investors, Pay Attention! This is a serious warning from the Securities Commission Malaysia against 5 scam brokers operating in the forex market without a legal license. Here is the list of 5 fake brokers you must avoid.