简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Questions are growing over the lack of updates from police after the arrest of three people believed to be behind the Gigamax investment scam. The arrests, which took place at Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) on 6 May, have raised hopes among victims but silence from the authorities has led to fresh concern.
Questions are growing over the lack of updates from police after the arrest of three people believed to be behind the Gigamax investment scam. The arrests, which took place at Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) on 6 May, have raised hopes among victims but silence from the authorities has led to fresh concern.
The Malaysian International Humanitarian Organisation (MHO) is now urging police to provide an official update. On 16 May, MHO handed a letter to the Bukit Aman Commercial Crime Investigation Department, asking for details about the suspects and the progress of the case.
According to MHO Secretary Hishamuddin Hashim, the suspects were taken to the Cheras police headquarters after their arrest, as reported by a Chinese-language newspaper on 9 May. Despite this, no official statement has been made.
The Gigamax scheme allegedly led to huge losses for investors, many of whom were promised high returns. Hishamuddin said that the 99 victims MHO represents lost more than RM4.8 million in total. He asked whether the suspects are still in custody, have been released on bail, or have been handed over to the Attorney-Generals Chambers for prosecution.
Police have previously said they opened an investigation under Section 420 of the Penal Code, which covers cheating and fraud. This followed a statement from Bank Negara Malaysia confirming that the investment scheme involved criminal elements.
In November last year, police arrested 11 people linked to the case. The group included two women, and the arrests were made in Kuala Lumpur, Selangor, Pahang, Kelantan, Terengganu, and Melaka. The suspects were aged between 34 and 59.
Investors are now calling for greater transparency. One of them, 60-year-old Noraishah Muhammad, said victims deserve to know what is happening. She hopes the suspects are not being protected and that authorities are serious about bringing them to justice.
For many who lost their savings, the lack of clear communication is deeply frustrating. MHO and affected investors say it is time for the police to speak openly about the case and give the public confidence that justice is being served.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
The Forex market is a jungle full of complex trades, high risks, and unpredictable moves. Without the right knowledge, you’re an easy target. In this environment, information is your only weapon. Many scam brokers are out there, ready to take advantage of uninformed traders. In this article, you will learn about another unlicensed broker: Quest.
FundedNext has been facing investor ire on forex broker review platforms for the numerous instances of foul play it has been part of. Investors face constant withdrawal issues, unfair and fake rules on trading, and several other issues. All these contribute to scams.
FRAUD ALERT! – All investors and traders should be careful. The UK’s financial regulator, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), has warned people about fake brokers that are working without a license. These scam brokers take people’s money and disappear. The FCA shares a list of these fake brokers every day to help people stay safe. Checkout the List below to Stay Safe.
A 54-year-old housewife has fallen victim to an online investment scam after being misled by an advertisement on social media, resulting in a total loss of RM68,242 over 13 separate transactions.